A central online resource for everything happening locally. There's a news section (issues), a messageboard/forum, local information and you can even download our newsletters from here. Let us know what you think, and get involved!

 

What's new?

 
 

 

 
 

 Wimbledon Park Hall

Update on the complaint to the local Government Ombudsman

 Chairman's report (from the Easter 2011 newsletter)

Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) Report

The final report from the LGO was received in February this year, almost one year since the complaint was originally issued. (What’s another year!) Whilst we were pleased the Ombudsman found that there was maladministration by the Council, causing injustice to the WPRA, the remedy recommended of a payment of £1500 by the Council to the Association, we find totally derisory and reflects in no way the loss of amenity suffered due to the, largely inexplicable delays.

However, we were dismayed by the seeming inability of the Ombudsman to appreciate the clear facts of the complaints in two areas. The first was the implications from the minutes of the Overview and Scrutiny Panel on the 6th July 2004 which recommended ‘that the funds from the sale of the hall be used solely for a community hall....’ and the subsequent Cabinet meeting on the 19th July 2004 where the cabinet resolved that, ‘the comments of the borough development plan Overview and Scrutiny panel on the draft brief for the redevelopment of the (hall) site be agreed and the planning brief.......’

In our view this clearly indicates that the funds from the sale of the hall were   effectively ‘ring-fenced’ for the redevelopment. As it turns out, the Council subsequently used the funds to redeem debt.

The second issue was the clear lack of any penalty clause (which we understand would be a standard inclusion in any commercial contract) in the contract between the Developer and the Council. In fact there is a reference in the contract to a penalty clause – which actually does not exist! This fact was ignored entirely!

There is no subsequent appeal process available to the Association apart from pursuing a Judicial Review. This is totally impractical in view of the cost implications.

According to the Ombudsman, the Council has to consider the report and tell the Ombudsman, within three months of receiving it, what action it has taken or intends to take. The Ombudsman will write to us when she has heard from the Council.

Overall I would have to say that we are very disappointed with the time the complaint has take to reach its conclusion and the poor level of appreciation of significant aspects of our complaint.

PS -Since this report we have received a Cheque for £1500 from the Council and in July we received a final letter from the LGO.

Click on this link to see the LGO letter.

   
 

Please click this link for a copy of the LGO complaint document 

   
 

Wandle Valley Regional Park Project

The Wandle Valley includes the Wandle Trail, a 20km (14 mile) trail which follows the route of the River Wandle from Croydon to the Thames at Wandsworth. It allows you to enjoy the heritage, flora and fauna of this typical chalk stream in the heart of some of south London’s most industrialised landscape.

There are both walking and cycling routes, which coincide for much of the way but differ in places. Part of the trail is National Cycle Network Route 22.

The Wandle Trail runs though Wimbledon Park yet access to the river is blocked.  The WPRA are exploring the possibility of opening up access to the stretch of the Wandle that runs through Wimbledon Park.

More details of the Wandle Valley Regional Park Project can be found at www.wandlevalleypark.org.uk   

 

 
  Grafitti Removal

For contact numbers click here

 

 





Welcome to WimbledonPark.com | Events | Documents | Issues | About Us | Links |

© Wimbledon Park Residents' Association - Site design and implementation by internetics ltd.